image
  660 Arbitration Awards...

CROA CASE NO. 4552 (May 9th 2017)
I agree with the Company that arbitrators should not second-guess management’s decision if the penalty is within a range of reasonable responses to the events. That being said, it is my view that a penalty of a 30 day suspension is outside the boundaries of a reasonable response to what in my view is a case of bad judgment by two employees who should have consulted with their supervisors about an equipment foul. Neither of the grievors have any disciplinary record. Nevertheless, there was a clear safety rule violation which calls for a significant penalty to deter others from similar choices in circumstances of this kind.
  Learn more...


CROA 4495 (October 11th 2014)
Accordingly, the grievors shall be reinstated in their employment, without compensation or loss of seniority, with the time between their termination and the date of this decision to be recorded as a suspension arising from the events of February 9, 2016. The arbitrator remains seized of any issues resulting from this decision.
  Learn more...


CASE NO. 4277 (January 15th 2014)
The Company has introduced a Drug and Alcohol Use and Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy ("the Policy") that provides for testing of employees and penalties for alleged violations of the Policy.
  Learn more...


CROA 4278 (January 15th 2014)
On November 30, 2012 Mr. Groulx was involved in an incident while employed as a Qualified Train Operator (Locomotive Engineer) while operating GO equipment 486.
  Learn more...


CROA 4164 (December 12th 2012)
The Company's failure to comply wit the provisions of the Employment Standards Act, 2000 in relation to hours of work.
  Learn more...


CROA 4084 (January 12th 2012)
The termination of Qualified Commuter Train Operator, F. Hederich, on November 18, 2010 for alleged violations of Rules 12-121 (a), (b) and (c) and GOI Section 8, Item 12.2 on October 15, 2010 and for alleged violations of CROR Rules 33, 102, 106, 13 and General Rule A(iii) and alleged violations of GOI Section 8, Item 12.1 on October 17, 2010.
  Learn more...


CROA 4083 (January 12th 2012)
3-day suspension assessed to K. Skeene.
  Learn more...


CROA 4082 (January 12th 2012)
1 day suspension assessed A. Ottley.
  Learn more...


CROA 4081 (January 12th 2012)
2-day suspension assessed to T. Steenkist.
  Learn more...


CROA 4080 (January 12th 2012)
Claim on behalf of N. Gordon-Tenant that he was called out of turn while assigned to the spareboard.
  Learn more...


CROA 4079 (January 12th 2012)
16 day suspension assessed Locomotive Engineer R. Ritchie.
  Learn more...


CROA 4073 (December 15th 2011)
The 3 day suspension assessed flowing an incident.
  Learn more...


CROA 4072 (December 15th 2011)
Discipline assessed to Commuter Train Operator on GO919.
  Learn more...


CROA 4071 (December 15th 2011)
Discipline assessed to Locomotive Engineer for alleged violation of various CROR rules.
  Learn more...


CROA 4070 (December 15th 2011)
The termination of probationary employee.
  Learn more...


CROA 3968 (January 11th 2011)
Dispute between TCRC Division 660 and Bombardier concerning 2 day suspension assessed Conductor Martin for his alleged violation of CROR 136, April 5, 2010.
  Learn more...


CROA 3967 (January 11th 2011)
Dispute between TCRC Division 660 and Bombardier concerning 30 day suspension assessed Locomotive Engineer P. Quinlan for his alleged failure to adequately control his train October 7, 2009.
  Learn more...


Maintenance Arbitration “ATU vs Bombardier “  (November 21st 2007)
November 2007 Maintenance Arbitration “ATU vs Bombardier “ re vacation entitlements.
  Learn more...


 
 Division 660 Meetings
The next Division 660 meeting will be held on Aug. 27th at 10:00.

This meeting is for TCRC Division 660 Bombardier employees of all classifications.

The meeting will be held at Long Branch legion 3850 Lakeshore blvd West.

Map...